think about the rosa parks ceremony. if that's what the court does and strikes down the formula, this goes right back to congress and the question would be would the congress have the same kind of will and energy it mustered in 1965 to come up with the voting rights act in the first place. that is not for me to answer, but tells you what the stakes are. >> they are covered by section five and municipalities in the states that are also covered here. as i understand it, the judges or justices challenge both sides. that is getting a lot of buzz and both sides were questioned significantly here. >> i think justice scalia's point, he used incendiary language. what he was trying to say is once a political institution likes congress and passes a law like this, it will never have the political will to take it back. he said it would be the role of the courts. that really is the question here. if the supreme court strikes down the voting rights act or at least this preclearance part of it, is there enough will in congress to sit d